Welcome Evie
07 Oct, 2025
With more firms relying on recruitment portals and ATS platforms, Iβve noticed a big rise in generic rejection messages along the lines of:
βππ°π³π³πΊ πΊπ°πΆ π©π’π·π¦π―βπ΅ π£π¦π¦π― π΄πΆπ€π€π¦π΄π΄π§πΆπ, π£πΆπ΅ πΈπ¦ πΈπͺπ΄π© πΊπ°πΆ π’ππ π΅π©π¦ π£π¦π΄π΅ π’π―π₯ πΈπͺππ π¬π¦π¦π± πΊπ°πΆπ³ π₯π¦π΅π’πͺππ΄ π°π― π§πͺππ¦.β
The value of these systems is great for both company and recruiter as they make admin and duplication so much easier and I completely appreciate it can be impossible to go back on every application.
But when someoneβs taken the time to prepare and attend an interview, I personally try my best (and I know on occasions I havenβt been able to do so) believe the least that should be offered is a few lines of honest feedback on where they fell short and how they can improve moving forward.
Sometimes, a quick call or a short, constructive message can make a huge difference, and it builds respect on both sides. Iβm seeing this lack of feedback hurting firmsβ reputations and even putting strong candidates off applying meaning firms could be missing out on top talent.
Are we losing the human element thatβs so important and is automation and efficiency coming at the cost of connection and development?
Iβm keen to hear from people on both sides of the interview table on what your take is?
Are ATS systems Killing feedback and the human element in recruitment?
